Comments on: IsItOpenData? tips http://science.okfn.org/2010/11/26/isitopendata-tips/ Mon, 07 Mar 2011 20:30:55 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.3.2 By: Is it Open Bibliographic Data? | Open Bibliography and Open Bibliographic Data http://science.okfn.org/2010/11/26/isitopendata-tips/#comment-29 Mon, 07 Mar 2011 20:30:55 +0000 http://science.okfn.org/?p=55#comment-29 […] helpful for making such an enquiry is Heather Piwowar’s guide IsItOpenData? tips. I’ll summarize the most important points adding information with respect to new […]

]]>
By: Heather Piwowar http://science.okfn.org/2010/11/26/isitopendata-tips/#comment-22 Sat, 27 Nov 2010 14:56:39 +0000 http://science.okfn.org/?p=55#comment-22 Good suggestion.

  • Biggest win for effort: more instructions. Include this info in the guide? Also, it isn’t clear if/why someone ought to create an account before making an enquiry.
  • Runner up win for effort: an updated email template. Also provide templates for the personal follow-up and the thank you emails, perhaps linked from the guide so people browsing can can see how easy it can be
  • Most annoying issue: I think the site kept doing strange things with linefeeds in email. Grrr.
  • Most really damaging issue: the fact that emails would be sent to spam, both emails to the publishers and also IsItOpen alert emails to enquirers. Not sure what can be done.
]]>
By: Rufus Pollock http://science.okfn.org/2010/11/26/isitopendata-tips/#comment-21 Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:25:55 +0000 http://science.okfn.org/?p=55#comment-21 Really useful tips Heather — and great work with the enquires.

I think we should try and incorporate as many of your suggestions as possible into the isitopen software. Do you have any thoughts on what the top improvements should be based on your experience here?

]]>
By: hpiwowar http://science.okfn.org/2010/11/26/isitopendata-tips/#comment-16 Fri, 26 Nov 2010 22:37:47 +0000 http://science.okfn.org/?p=55#comment-16 Note: Publisher responses might take a while (2.5 months in one case).

]]>